Do people like, still blog?

Tag Archives: comics

Oh great, yet another Spider-man movie. Even though this is based off his cameo in Captain America: Civil War, I am a bit weary of this. I never liked the character but he is just so popular that you can’t avoid his books and stories. And another reboot in his movie series, isn’t this the third time?

So this movie didn’t start off well for me. It got worse when the plot followed a teenager’s life. I’m just not interested in watching teen struggles anymore. And his wisecracking is too much. The story isn’t much better as we get to see some B-list Spider-Man villains (Vulture and Shocker). The best part are the cameos but it feels like a crutch for both Spider-Man and the movie.

I don’t think this movie advances the Marvel Universe storyline so it can easily be skipped. Two out of five stars.


On my flight back home, I was surprised to find new movies in the inflight entertainment system! The movie I was most excited about was Wonder Woman. Ever since her introduction in Batman vs Superman, I’ve been waiting for her feature movie to come out. I’m not even a big fan of the character, I had tried reading some of her comics in the past but always ended up dropping them because the stories were boring (Amazonian stuff), or the supporting characters were lame, or the issues she had to deal with (e.g., her weaknesses) were not compelling. So I only saw her in Justice League adventures, or when there is a universe-level crisis.

But her appearance in BvS was amazing. This is a career-defining role for Gal Gadot and I don’t think I can ever envision her as any other character. I’m not sure what it is, but she is both what I imagined Wonder Woman to look like, yet also not what she looks like. What I mean is that when she is in costume, there is no one else that I can imagine as being Wonder Woman but her face is not at all what Wonder Woman would look like in my mind (I guess due to her heritage). This is more apparent when she is in plain clothes, and she doesn’t look at all like how I imagine Diana Prince would be.

Anyways, so how was the movie? I didn’t think it was as good as people said it would be. It’s nowhere near Ghost In The Shell bad, but it’s still polarizing. The story is clunky and I hate the origin story where they kept stressing her naivete and social awkwardness. The romance is unbelievable, but not as bad as sailing to London in one night (even if they got a lift). Also the motley crew of supporting characters adds nothing to the story (I only recognize Etta, are the others even from the comic?)

But once the fighting starts, it is glorious. Wonder Woman is magnificent in battle, especially the close quarters fighting (on the beach and before Act 2). Some people hate Zach Snyder slowing down the camera for certain scenes, but I like it and think it was effective. Act 2 was expected and cliché but I still thought it was a great twist. Honestly this whole movie can just be Wonder Woman jumping and fighting and it would still be three out of five stars.


Ghost in the Shell was all around me when I was in my teens. I was never interested in anime, but this was one of the names I recognized. I might have even watched an anime movie version of it. And I definitely read an entire comic book series about it. Yet I don’t remember any details, the back story, or the potential psychological conflict of being part human-part machine.

This recognition is part of the reason why I watched the movie. Another is because I read some complaints when it was released about being white-washed (specifically Scarlett Jo instead of a Japanese lead). I don’t think the lead was the issue, but rather than a lot of it just wasn’t Japanese. The robotics company was completely staffed by Caucasians, the local police was a conglomerate of mixed cultures, and the entire thing was filmed in Hong Kong! I recognized Mong Kok in the beginning and it just became more and more obvious as I watched. I guess filming in HK made sense since a lot of the production companies at the beginning of the movie were Chinese.

The other issue with this movie is that it sucked. The decisions characters made made no sense and the dialogue was horrible. I hope Scarlett Johansson made a lot of money on this one because it is an embarrassment to have on your resume. It’s like Black Widow had a feature film and dyed her hair black.

A lot of the times the movie is just there to show off action sequences or body shots or the futuristic environment. I guess that is slightly cool and elevates this movie to 2 out of 5 stars.


Marvel seems to have their movies spread out over the year and this one ended up as the one that was on my flight to Korea. I think I saw the original Guardians of the Galaxy on a plane too (as it was released after we had kids). Not a must watch, but I was curious because I thought I read that they were gearing up for Infinity Gems and a showdown with Thanos.

But this movie wasn’t it, it was just another adventure featuring these guys, a couple of old friends from the original movie, and the early 80s music, fashion and styles.

There have been so many movies in the Marvel universe that you can just pick a random one up and watch it to pass the time. They don’t feel like tent pole releases or must-watch titles anymore. I guess that makes it perfect for flights.

GG2 has a specific conversational style, lots of wisecracks and insults (but not to an extent as say Deadpool). I don’t find that particularly entertaining though. They also have Drax playing the straight man, until they find a new character who is even straighter! I find the former funny because Drax seems to know that he is being funny. The latter feels like they’re making fun of Autistic people.

Lots of explosions, some laughs, and a megalomaniac to defeat. Also, another movie about father issues (see Star Wars & etc). Three out of five stars from me.


While perusing the store, I noticed Postknight. TBH, what attracted to me to this game was that it was “Unreleased”. What does that mean? I still don’t know but the game is decent enough that I play it every once in awhile. You basically do bite-sized auto-runner type quests to gain XP and items. You can trade items for better gear or use them to gain favor with the ladies (i.e., dating in Harvest Moon style). I just play it for the RPG elements because the dating aspect requires you to play too often. It’s a quick enough time killer and you can slowly improve your character so that’s why it’s staying on my phone.

There are a lot of DC and Marvel games around, but I downloaded Justice League Action Run because the art is reminiscent of the animated series. I actually think this game might be for younger kids based on the art and the simplicity. It’s an infinite runner with a couple of modes – collect items, break targets, fight the boss, etc; but the draw is the theme and the art. Unfortunately, the game seems to be recently released, and not polished yet. The interface and gameplay is laggy on my phone, and there are only 5 heroes to choose from! Hopefully it will get better in time, but by then, I think I will have moved on to something else.


I don’t know the backstory of Suicide Squad but I think this is required watching as DC continues to build up its movie universe to the Justice League movie. But after watching it, there doesn’t to be a big need for this movie.

It’s basically a self-contained movie similar to Guardians of the Galaxy where a rag tag band of shadowy figures save the world. There are some cameos from Batman and The Joker but its just to fill in the backstory. There are some character introductions and the after credits scene is important (for the universe) but I think those can be shared without tagging an entire movie along with it.

The plot is formulaic. Bad guys get together to help (read: are forced) the good guys, but the good guys suffer a setback and then bad guys develop a conscience and volunteer to beat the big bad guy. Its not boring but it is forgettable. I remember reading some press saying the atmosphere or music was great, but neither impressed me. This is a quite average three out of five stars.


Coup is a quick game where you need to bluff your way to victory. You have 2 cards in your hand that you can use to backup your bluff(s), and those cards don’t replenish. Once you have no cards in your hand, you are eliminated so you need to bluff carefully. I think this game would be great if the UI was simpler and the rounds were faster, but there’s just too much graphic detail in the game to make it enjoyable. Oh and the ads. They make the game too annoying to outweigh the marginal enjoyment I get out of playing this, so unfortunately it is an uninstall.

I bought Sentinels of the Multiverse on sale (99¢ I think?) based on what I read from the listing. It seemed interesting as it is a board/card game (later discovered that it originated on Kickstarter) where you play cooperatively as a superhero team to defeat a villain. Or in my case, you play 4 heroes by yourself. I liked the style as it is done as if it were a comic book (the universe was created just for this game, but the heroes fit DC stereotypes). The game itself is very complex. There are a lot of mechanics, and even after several plays, I spend most of the game reading and understanding the cards (which is difficult on phone resolution). That is both a benefit and a curse. It’s good in that in makes the game more of a puzzle than a board game, but it’s bad in that it is not something you can play on automatic. You have to devote concentration and 30-60mins for a game. I’m still on the fence as to whether this is a game I will revisit or not.


This was another film that I had no expectations about, but I was interested in seeing because I read so many X-Men comics when I was younger. I think there were a couple of X-Men movies that I missed but luckily this was like a reboot.

The movie was set in the 80s (whenever Return of the Jedi came out) and was quite charming because of it. No doubt it helps the movie appeal to target an older demographic with disposable income. One of the best parts in the movie was set to the Eurythmics’ Sweet Dreams Are Made Of These.

I liked the movie overall because there were a lot of characters, cameos and quirky things from the Marvel universe, but from a plot perspective I think it was very fragmented. There were a ton of characters introduced which meant the story wasn’t very deep or long. Apocalypse didn’t even get to do much aside from recruit, stand around and order his minions. Kind of a boring villain.

The were a lot of grand scenes a la Batman vs Superman, but overall I found the fights not very interesting. It was kind of like trying to punch through each other by unleashing your mutant powers all at once – the exception were the Nightcrawler fights.

Before writing this review, I was thinking of giving this movie 4 out of 5 stars because i really did enjoy it. But I think that I was just marvelled about the surroundings and didn’t pay too much attention to the story. I think I’ll give X-Men: Apocalypse 3 out of 5 stars.


When I read the comic series upon which this premise was based on, I was very impressed at the scenario and the questions it posed. However, I was not confident that this story arc would transfer well into a single movie, so wasn’t especially looking forward to watching it. Also, I missed Avengers 2 so that was no good either (where did Vision come from?).

There were some good parts that discussed the pros and cons of the human registration act (Sokovia Accords) but overall this was just a beat’em up fest. I liked and disliked the commercial for the Spider-man reboot. It was fun, but it felt forced (although he was in the comic story arc). For whatever reason, the Marvel movies just don’t appeal to me as much as the DCU ones right now. I’ll give this 2 out of 5 stars


My flight down to Dallas didn’t have VOD on the chair in front of me (AA wanted you to use your own device) but my AC flight back did, so I waited until my return flight to watch Batman vs Superman. I wanted to see it but didn’t have high expectations with it being a DC film – Marvel (except the Spider-man franchise) is the gold standard even though I enjoyed the Nolan Batman trilogy. I also heard that the movie was a bit heavy-handed in the whole “Control of the Gods” theme.

I was pleasantly surprised and enjoyed the film a great deal – it’s at least four out of five stars. I think it was because the film was so dark. In Marvel films, the world is in despair but there is still hope and colour. In BvS, it’s like they took the feel of Gotham and applied it to the entire movie. The dystopia is inevitable so why don’t we begin acting like it.

I don’t have a good example but I also felt the plot gave the feeling of a mature world (like Ultimates vs Avengers). It was no-nonsense and trim. The fights and action were fast and crisp, just like superheroes would handle things. I didn’t feel the concept of the Gods were overblown – let’s be clear, the movie was about the three gods of the DC universe. I found Batman’s actions fitting because he is supposed to be paranoid! Luthor is supposed to scheme, Superman is supposed to do what is right, and well I guess we will see what WW does in the future (she’s more like Catwoman at the beginning than WW). I’m also glad they didn’t overemphasize Batman’s brooding or Superman’s boy scout personality.

This was an efficient and entertaining movie and I hope the future Justice League movies will be similar as I’d rather watch these than the Avengers.


Deadpool was the movie I most wanted to watch on my flight out to Korea because there was a lot of hype surrounding it when it was in theaters. I know about Deadpool and his reputation, but I had never followed his series so I didn’t know his backstory & etc. I can’t remark on how faithful it adheres to his canon but the other Marvel universe cameos were only OK, and not cool! moments (X-Men, SHIELD Helicarrier).

I didn’t think that Deadpool was worthy of the praise. The breaking of the 4th wall was not too useful (and I think this is probably something he does in the comics?) It was rated R because there was definitely a lot of (gratuitous) blood, but I don’t think that added to the movie. The plot was interleaving, but still straightforward because there wasn’t a lot of substance to it, and the X-Men inclusion seemed forced (doesn’t help that these are B and C-list X-Men). If you’re fine with impossibly accurate shooting from the heroes and horrible aim from the bad guys, then this is a great movie. For me, I rate this movie as a 3 out of 5 because while there are a lot of bad points, it is a (perhaps non-typical but) enjoyable summer blockbuster movie.


  • The Secret History of Ultimate Marvel, the Experiment That Changed Superheroes Forever
    It’s been several years since I stopped reading comics, but when I did I devoured the Ultimate universe comics from Marvel. I didn’t know that it was winding down (not by choice) so this was news to me, and it is always interesting to hear some of the back story behind the genesis of the idea.

    The history of Ultimate Marvel is, in a way, a story about warring approaches to a reboot: Bendis’s and Millar’s. Bendis wanted to polish the old archetypes; Millar wanted to aggressively critique them. Bendis sought timeless stories; Millar craved biting contemporary political critique. Bendis was looking to inspire; Millar aimed to disquiet. As Bendis put it: “I’m writing about hope and he’s writing about nihilism, and I know he doesn’t always think he is, but he is. Constantly.”

  • In Flight
    An article that has been going around, written by a pilot, about what happens on a routine trip from London to Tokyo. There’s a lot of colorful English being used but beyond the high school english assignment, there are some interesting tidbits that you wouldn’t be aware of unless you were a pilot.

    INTAK is a waypoint. An airplane typically navigates through sky countries along a route composed of a few radio beacons and many waypoints. Waypoints are defined by coordinates or their bearing and distance from a beacon, and by a name, which typically takes the form of a five-letter capitalized word — EVUKI, JETSA, SABER — that’s pronounceable and distinct to controllers and pilots regardless of their first language. Waypoint names are the sky’s audible currency of place, atomized and distinct.

  • Viacom Is Having A Midlife Crisis
    Viacom used to be great, but the owner is not as involved anymore and it seems like it’s going downhill because of that. Of course, no one wants to admit that that is the reason…

    Dauman has taken an unusual tack when he’s spoken to analysts about Viacom’s recent performance. The lower ratings for its programming, he says, aren’t the result of the rising popularity of YouTube or poor creative choices at Viacom. Instead, the loss of viewers is an illusion, he says. The fans are there in growing numbers. They just aren’t being properly counted. According to Dauman, Nielsen’s ratings fail to account for the TV that people consume via apps on their smartphones, streaming devices such as Roku, desktop websites, or various video-on-demand services. “Inadequate measurement undermines innovation,” Dauman said during a recent earnings call, “and disproportionately impacts those leading programmers like us who effectively provide the multiplatform experiences that viewers demand.”

  • When One App Rules Them All: The Case of WeChat and Mobile in China
    A primer on how WeChat is different and why it’s successful in China. I tried using WeChat and Weibo in the past but since I can’t read Chinese, it was a non-starter for me. I guess I’ll have to wait until some company in the Western world brings over the idea.

    This focus on function over social has significant consequences for brands. Where brands must rely on static, one-size-fits all blasts in U.S. social networks — and users are confined to only liking, favoriting, commenting on, or sharing posts — WeChat shows us what’s possible when brands are offered more options for interacting with their users. For example, where Starbucks could post an offer for all users on its Facebook page, on WeChat, it could theoretically also allow a user to inquire after their gift card balance, place a favorite drink order, find the nearest store without having to specify intent, or receive a promotion tailored to drink preferences based on the weather in that city. Where a celebrity like Taylor Swift can share 140 characters about her upcoming concert on Twitter, on WeChat, she could send a concert discount code to users who purchased her album, or charge users a small fee for daily pre-recorded morning greetings (some celebrities in Asia actually already do this!).

  • How Canada’s economy went from boom to recession so fast
    Not surprisingly: lower resource demand and China.

    By the time the smoke cleared, nearly $3.2 trillion had been wiped off the Chinese stock market—or, about twice the value of India’s entire stock market value. Put another way: Greece’s total government debt—the cause of austerity measures, panicked bailout renegotiations, and even a referendum—is only $375 billion, or about one-10th the amount lost by Chinese stock traders.


After watching Gone Girl on my flight back from SF, I had enough time for one more movie. Unfortunately the selection of recent movies on Air Canada was poor this month and I ended up picking Kingsmen: The Secret Service. As I don’t watch TV/pay attention to movies, I didn’t really know what this movie was about – nor did I know that it was based on a comic book.

It turns out that this movie is somewhat of a satire of Bond/Spy movies. But not in an Austin Powers type of way, so I enjoyed the parts that were a parody much better. I’m sure the plot will be dated in 5 or 10 years, but it was entertaining for me right now.

As the movie does not take itself too seriously, there is also a lot of liberty in the plot. As long as you approach it as a fun movie that will kill 2 hours, then I think you’ll enjoy it. I give this one 3 out of 5 stars.


Unlike The Imitation Game, I had wanted to see Big Hero 6 for a long time – ever since I heard that the visuals were a combination of San Francisco and Tokyo. But I was hesitant to see it on my flight because I had a copy at home that I hadn’t watched yet – so should I bother watching it on a small screen? I decided that I might as well since my copy at home has been unwatched for awhile.

Aside from the little nugget above, I didn’t know much about the film. But it was interesting right off the bat – the premise is there is a prepubescent hotshot who has his eyes opened about how cool tech is being researched at a nearby technical school (cartoon equivalent of Berkley or Stanford). I liked how Disney basically wove in Silicon Valley (but being a cartoon, they could make up a lot of technology).

Following that is your basic superhero group story, fighting against a super villain. One good thing is that because there’s no backstory/fandom, they could build a group from scratch (it doesn’t help them avoid clichés though). Given that the movie is for kids or pre-teens, I’m not too bothered about that.

I’m going to give Big Hero 6 5 stars out of 5! That might be a little overrated but I’m fine with it. It’s a kids movie so I don’t expect a lot aside from it being fun – and it was. There were actually quite a number of funny parts that appeal to adults/comic book nerds and having a cool mash up city definitely helps its score here.


After a long break from reading comics, I read a couple this week – but it’s not what you think. I’m not reading comics by Marvel, DC, one of those smaller indie publishers (Top Cow et al – do they still exist/are independent)? Nor is it manga or anything of that sort.

I read a couple of comics books by Guy Delisle who is a Quebecer (trained locally at Sheridan) but now lives in France. His work and life has taken him to a couple of places in Asia and he wrote/illustrated his impression and adventures there.

What tipped me to his books was one about his trip to Pyongyang, North Korea. I enjoying reading about that country and his version of events is a nice, light read. There’s nothing about prison camps, just what daily life is like as a foreigner in that country.

I then read his book about Shenzen (and thus China) and Burma. The adventures in China are not surprising as I’m familiar with the culture, but Burma was new to me. Apparently he has a couple of other books that I might look up a little later!


I had a little over 2.5 hours left after my first movie on my flight, so I decided to fill that by watching Captain America 2. I wouldn’t typically watch this movie, but there just wasn’t anything else worth watching. It wasn’t a bad movie and overall more enjoyable than In Bruges but as a comic book fan, I didn’t like it very much.

Black Widow is in it, but I think it could be any sidekick beside Cap and it would’ve sufficed (although I suppose there needed to be a female co-star). Falcon is in it, but I think he wasn’t that important either (assuming there could be another plot that doesn’t require flying). The Winter Solider is in it, but he wasn’t in it enough. The (comic) history of the Winter Solider would have been more interesting to focus on, especially his relationship with Steve Rogers; and while they dwelled on it for awhile, it was only one of several plotlines.

The action scenes with Captain were great, he fought like how you would expect him to fight; but I thought the action scenes got worse as the movie went along – but I guess an “enhanced” human could only do so much. Because I had low expectations and wasn’t keen on seeing it anyways, I’ll give this a 3 out of 5 stars; just like the first Captain America movie.


Wow I haven’t watched a movie for a long time but I had a 6 hr flight to SFO so there was ample time to change that. I was surprised by the lack of selection as the last time I looked at the in flight entertainment was when flying overseas. The one movie I wanted to watch the most was Guardians of the Galaxy.

I wasn’t very familiar with the characters in this Marvel flick but knew of them because I had played the Android game recently. So that was pretty useful. A lot of them actually used their weapons/skills so it was enjoyable to see those in action.

I also had a chance to buy the soundtrack for 99¢ a few weeks ago but declined as I didn’t like the songs well enough. However, I think the music and soundtrack works well with the movie and listening it with headphones was probably beneficial

The movie was pretty fun and I think its ok even if you don’t know the characters. It’s a good mix of comedy and action. I’d give it 4 out of 5 stars (but maybe it’s because I have low expectations)


The Dark Knight Returns is probably the most anticipated movie of the summer for me (by that I mean that I’m actually aware it is coming out this summer!) and in preparation for this huge event, I decided to be a good student and do some studying beforehand; that is, I rewatched Batman Begins and The Dark Knight. Interestingly, I would have switched my ratings of the movies now (5 for #1, 3 for #2); Batman Begins felt like a typical comic book movie, while TDK felt more epic and I appreciate the characterization of the Joker more now (although probably would give it 4/5 instead of 5/5).

After cramming the movies, I watched The Dark Knight Returns last Friday in UltraAVX. This was my first time seeing something in UltraAVX and I was not too impressed. The seats/legroom was better, and the reserved seating was good; but I didn’t really notice better video or sound. There is a price differential but considering how often I go to see movies, it wouldn’t be burning a hole in my wallet.

I avoided the spoilers for most of the week before I saw it, but did hear that TDKR was not that good (as its predecessor), and I tend to agree. The problem I had in all three movies is that Batman seems to be a vehicle being carried through the movies. Sure, he has the benefit of miraculous technical capability, and the uncanny ability to be in the right places at the right time; but these things are unbelievable and exist only because of our willing suspension of disbelief – nothing explains these as core Batman “powers”. In the comics, Batman is seen as a master stratagem and in control of the situation (i.e., the villains are playing into his hands); and we don’t really see this in the movies. Commissioner Gordon just reacts (sometimes foolhardily) to the situation, as does Batman. It is only the Joker who exhibits this characteristic and is one of the reasons that TDK was so good (I think there are shades to this in TDKR once we find out the final villain, but their effect isn’t visualized like the Joker’s is).

Without a Joker as a foil, The Dark Knight Returns is not as strong a movie. It’s not as fun to see a villain whose strength is Batman’s obvious weakness. It’s more interesting to see a villain beat the hero using their strong points – like how Doomsday outmatched Superman in strength. In fact, my comparison from my TDK review is Iron Man, and I think that analogy is apt; Batman has as much technical superiority over his combatants as Iron Man.

It wasn’t a bad movie, it was just not as good given the expectations of Nolan and the precedent he set with The Dark Knight. I’d rate it three out of 5 stars.


Here’s the last DC comics movie review for awhile, I promise!

I expected this last one to be the most boring so I saved it for last. Many reasons for this, one is because it focused on a single hero instead of the eclectic JLA (and resident joker Flash). Second, the store focused on Batman. I like/liked Batman, but I am just a bit tired of his brooding act. And it makes him one dimensional in my opinion; as the cartoons never focus on his Bruce Wayne persona. So I didn’t expect much, but fortunately I was slightly happy with the result.

The story of Batman: Under The Red Hood focuses on the death of the second Robin, Jason Todd, and his subsequent re-emergence as the quasi-villain and current incarnation of the Red Hood. Batman and the Red Hood fight, and as Red Hood is his protegé they are fairly evenly-matched. Eventually they deal with the conflict; well I’m not going to say how as that would spoil the ending 🙂

Looking at it impartially, it isn’t that good; but because I didn’t expect much, it was more entertaining than I would have thought. I will give it 2.5/5.


After I saw Justice League Doom, I decided to see if I missed any other Justice League features, and apparently I did. A lot of time. The first one I watched in order to catch up with Justice League: New Frontier.

What struck me as odd while watching New Frontier is that it seemed new and fresh. Apparently, I forgot that I had watched it only four years ago even though the story is out of weird and a throwback. Huh. All I can say is that the other animated films I saw in that blog must have been horrible because this time around, New Frontier wasn’t that great. I suppose it is because the story wasn’t a surprise and didn’t wasn’t greatly rewritten to suit TV and the times?

On the other hand, I liked Crisis On Two Earths a lot more. I guess I never saw it before, but it did have a lot of memorable themes – the parallel universe JLA (Crime Syndicate), cameos by (former) JLA reserve members (Black Canary, Firestorm, Black Lightning etc), and random tie-ins/in jokes to the DC universe (Wonder Woman’s invisible jet). I thought the writing was much better, with funnier jokes. I’d give it a 3.5 out of 5 and a 3 out of 5 to New Frontier.


I stopped reading comics about a year ago because it was too much of a hassle to follow the release cycle (and I didn’t want to subscribe to a service to deliver them). So I didn’t know that the Justice League animated series had released any more features until recently when I came across Justice League Doom.

Justice League Doom centers around the contingency plan Batman has for each Justice League member in case they go rogue. Unfortunately this plan was stolen by Vandal Savage and then enacted against the JLA in order to prevent them from thwarting Savage’s larger plan.

Much like the Avengers, I felt the film went a bit scatter brain in having to give each JLA member a this-is-me scene, and then another scene where they had been neutralized. This made the story choppy. I also felt that the movie wasn’t as interesting as the previous episodes that I had seen; the jokes weren’t as funny (or adult) and it was just a lot of fighting. Unfortunately, I’d give Justice League Doom a 2 out of 5 stars.


The last movie that I saw in theatres was Captain America, almost a year ago. I’ve followed that up with another Marvel movie, which features Captain America – Avengers! I haven’t really been too enthusiastic about the movie because I’ve never really been interested in the Avengers. The X-Men or Justice League of America are more intruiging to me. Nevertheless, I went and saw Avengers and didn’t regret it.

I would give it 3.5 stars out of 5, although I know many people liked it much more. I think Joss Whedon’s comedic writing gave it an additional 0.5 rating. I really only felt his impact in the comedy, I didn’t think there were more or less comic geek in-jokes in this one compared to other Marvel films I’ve seen.

I actually didn’t think that highly of the movie, mostly because I felt that there was too much talking and character development; even though at the same time I noticed that the character development was compressed and each character was only given a short time to establish why they should be in the movie. I feel this way because I already know a lot about all the characters (including Maria Hill of SHIELD) so I just want to see the bashing and smashing (and the comedy I suppose). So at times, the 2:15 film dragged for me.


There’s an Avengers movie coming out in 2012, and in order to make it as action-packed as possible, Marvel has been spending the last few years releasing movies about the various super-heroes in Avengers (Hulk Remake, Iron Man, and Thor). The last in the series is Captain America.

Captain America on the surface is a boring hero. He has no mystical or “superhuman” powers; in a sense he is a lot like Batman. He’s also THE flag carrying member of US military so many of his stories revolve around the typical US vs Nazi/Soviet/Vietnam war themes. But, he’s also the leader of the Avengers so it’s important to build up his back story.

The movie version of his backstory is somewhat faithful. It takes place back in the 40s where the US super-soldier program was happening to give the Allies an advantage of the Axis. There are a couple of new secondary characters, but the main theme of puny Steve Rogers becoming the only successful super-soldier still remains. He helps take down Nazi Germany but ends up in present day. That’s the good fan-boy part.

The plot arrives at its destination, but there are a lot of nonsensical scenes where suddenly the world is OK again (for example, Cap jumping through fire – how did they get out of the building?). I think the editing could use some work because it plot didn’t work smoothly as a movie. I’ll give this a 3 out of 5 stars.


I forget why I wanted to watch Iron Man 2, and now that I’ve seen it, I’m pretty sure it’s not because it got good reviews. The movie’s not very good and it feels like you’re locked in a track and have to wait as it reaches its destination. It didn’t seem like a movie from this generation in that there were several scenes where the characters seem to just sit around and shoot the breeze (maybe I’m too familiar with the Iron Man/Marvel backstory). I suppose it’s character development, but I personally found it boring. The fights weren’t impressive at all – although Iron Man doesn’t have a lot of special powers, he can’t Kung Fu or anything; he can only be impervious and shoot some repulsor beams.

There were a couple of enjoyable things. The snippy dialog between Tony Stark and Pepper Potts was fun, although maybe a bit too fast. And I finally got interested in the movie when Nick Fury showed up. I also liked the cameo of a half-constructed Captain America shield.

I’ll think Iron Man 2 is 2 out of 5 stars. It just doesn’t feel very well put together. The plot has too many holes – for example, what happens now that the US military have Arc Reactors? Iron Man is no longer 20 years ahead of the game.


I haven’t seen a movie in a movie theatre in over a year! But my streak was finally broken when Nelson suggested that we go see Scott Pilgrim vs the World. I don’t watch commercials, pay attention to media, read movie blogs, etc so I had no idea what this movie was about; and for so many parts in the movie I kept thinking, “Wow, that makes no sense at all”. But it was an enjoyable experience and fun to watch.

The premise is that Scott is an early 20s loser (ok – aspiring musician) hanging out in what looks to be Toronto’s Annex, and has to do battle with his new girlfriend’s 7 exes. And by “do battle”, I mean “do battle” but not in a fighting way. It’s actually in a crazy Chinese-movie style way, where the combatants all of a sudden have super powers. The battles imitate video games where Scott can leap into the air and air combo his opponent with a 60-hit combo. So it actually is more like Street Fighter. Plus, there is actually an animation that tells us he did a 64-hit combo.

The movie centers around these incredulous fights between Scott and the Exes; but surprisingly, those are the most relatable parts of the film (well at least if you’re familiar with video games). Linking the fights together are some awkward moments between the characters. It almost seems like bad acting, but now that I think about it, it is almost like live comic strips. The scenes are simple and not complicated by extraneous cognitive load – there is straightforward dialog which leads to a comic strip punchline, before repeating and setting up the next punchline (or fight). But because of that, it feels disjointed, although not in a way where it doesn’t make sense nor is it detrimental to the plot.

Aside from the fact that it was interestingly odd, the appeal of SP vs tW is that it was placed in Toronto. There were a lot of Toronto landmarks (Casa Loma, Honest Eds, Lee’s Palace) and culture (CBC, SARS, Second Cup). It felt home grown! Although the movie both makes sense and doesn’t make sense at all, and is deeply entrenched in video game culture, it was strangely entertaining. I would give it 4 out of 5 stars.